So RH are you saying only some jeeps come close to the Range Rover in off roading?
What about your SUV?  The FJ Cruiser and such.   

I think the term is fanboy, lol and yeah they are good, but they don't offroad as well when they are in the shop for repairs haha.  Dollar for dollar nothing beats a jeep, of course H1 takes the cake but they are expensive as hell and so is the diesel fuel burning in them. 

I know a guy with an old FJ and its pretty versatile, id love an international scout myself.  But I'm not going to say the range rover or land rover isn't capable, I haven't seen anyone do anything real daring in one though.

^^^heh.

Here's an impartial judgment  : 

The way around the ruts is to drive on them, not in them. 
If the range had the option of 2wd, it could do that whole track in it.  Yes, you might not get it first try every time but when it comes to mud and clay, its all about traction and inertia.  Your right in that its designed to make people who have never been off road go WOW, I just made it through a mud puddle in the woods.  I was more making fun of the fact that they were touting how awesome it was that a Range can make it through that simple terrain.  It is capable of so much more.  I was only partially questioning its abilities, but since you brought it up.  It doesn't even look like it comes with locking diffs anymore!?  From what I can tell from the website it only comes with a center locking diff and advanced traction control.  Hill decent is a joke, really people?  You can't drive down a hill??  You also notice Clarkson says the range can go back up the hill but doesn't show it.  There is no way that or any suv could get up that hill given how wet and sloppy it was.  You also notice how they didn't bring the all mighty Range past where the x5 and Trooper got stuck.  The thing is that no matter what vehicle or equipment, traction is king so tires have more to do with it than anything else.  If you put Mud Terrains on the x5 it would do circles around the Range and JGC in that video.  The only place you really need low range (Clarkson's reason for the range being better off road) is on rocks when traction is plentiful and precision driving decisions are more important.  Again, I'm not saying the Range isn't capable, but despite what their heritage might suggest its no better than any other not totally pussified suv.  Range Rover now is a luxury brand, not an off-road brand.  The only thing that might make a Range more capable off road than others currently on the market is the adjustable ride height.  Though what that means in a luxury truck is that the truck can be lowered like a car for normal driving, and raised to only slightly above average when off road.  Not, it drives like a truck and push a button to make it a crazy capable off-road vehicle that owners with big heads think they are.

Speaking of expensive off roaders... do you know how much the new Wrangler is!?  I was a the auto show and there was one optioned out it was heading to 40k!?  That is with a lift, bumpers, Winch etc but still!?  A Wrangler!???

admit it... you're just being sucked in by the pretty electronic screens

Awesome! Just let me know. They are used.